Table of contents
- Introduction
- What's a Healthy Weight?
- Waist Size Matters,Too
- Keeping Things Level
- What Causes Weight Gain?
- What Leads to Weight Loss?
- Lessons From Losers
- General Strategies for Achieving or Maintaining a Healthy Weight
- The Bottom Line: Recommendations For Healthy Weight
- References
Introduction
When it comes to nutrition, it's easy to spend a lot of time worrying
about what to eat. But how much you eat puts as much of a stamp on your
long-term health as picking the right kind of fat or choosing the right
mix of vitamins.
How much you weigh (in relation to your height), your waist size,
and how much weight you've gained since your mid-20s strongly influence
your chances of:
- dying early,
- having, or dying from, a heart attack, stroke, or other type of cardiovascular disease,
- developing diabetes,
- developing cancer of the colon, kidney, breast, or endometrium,
- having arthritis,
- developing gallstones,
- being infertile,
- developing asthma as an adult,
- snoring or suffering from sleep apnea,
- developing cataracts, or
- having a poorer quality of life.
Although researchers are quibbling about just how many people die each
year as a direct cause of excess weight and what it costs our
health-care system, excess weight takes an enormous toll—all the more
worrisome, given that we are in the midst of an obesity epidemic.
If your weight is in the healthy range and isn't more than 10 pounds
over what you weighed when you turned 21, great. Keeping it there—and
keeping it steady—by watching what you eat and exercising will limit
your risk of developing one or more of the chronic conditions noted
above. If you are overweight, doing whatever you can to prevent gaining
more weight is a critical first step. Then, when you're ready, shedding
some pounds and keeping them off will be important steps to better
health.
What's a Healthy Weight?
Although nutrition experts still debate the precise limits of what
constitutes a healthy weight, there's a good working definition based
on the ratio of weight to height. This ratio, called the body mass
index (or BMI for short), takes into account the fact that taller
people have more tissue than shorter people, and so tend to weigh more.
Dozens of studies that have included more than a million adults have
shown that a body mass index above 25 increases the chances of dying
early, mainly from heart disease or cancer, and that a body mass index
above 30 dramatically increases the chances. Based on this consistent
evidence, a healthy weight is one that equates with a body mass index
less than 25. By convention, overweight is defined as a body mass index
of 25 to 29.9, and obesity is defined as a body mass index of 30 or
higher.
Nothing magical happens when you cross from 24.9 to 25 or from 29.9
to 30. These are just convenient reference points. Instead, the chances
of developing a weight-related health problems increases across the
range of weights.
Muscle and bone are more dense than fat, so an athlete or muscular
person may have a high body mass index, but not be fat. It's this very
thing that makes weight gain during adulthood such an important
determinant of weight-related health—few adults add muscle and bone
after their early twenties, so nearly all that added weight is fat.
Waist Size Matters, Too Some research suggests that not all fat is created equal. Fat that
accumulates around the waist and chest (what's called abdominal
adiposity) may be more dangerous for long-term health than fat that
accumulates around the hips and thighs.
Some studies suggest that abdominal fat plays a role in the development
of insulin resistance and inflammation, an overactivity of the immune
system that has been implicated in heart disease, diabetes, and even
some cancers. It's also possible, of course, that abdominal fat isn't
worse than fat around the hips or thighs, but instead is a signal of
overall body-fat accumulation that weight alone just doesn't capture.
In people who are not overweight, waist size may be an even more telling warning sign of increased health risks than BMI.
The Nurses' Health Study, for example, looked at the relationship
between waist size and death from heart disease, cancer, or any cause
in middle-aged women. At the start of the study, all 44,000 study
volunteers were healthy, and all of them measured their waist size and
hip size. After 16 years, women who had reported the highest waist
sizes—35 inches or higher—had nearly double the risk of dying from
heart disease, compared to women who had reported the lowest waist
sizes (less than 28 inches). Women in the group with the largest waists
had a similarly high risk of death from cancer or any cause, compared
with women with the smallest waists. The risks increased steadily with
every added inch around the waist. And even women at a "normal
weight"—BMI less than 25—were at a higher risk, if they were carrying
more of that weight around their waist: Normal-weight women with a
waist of 35 inches or higher had three times the risk of death from
heart disease, compared to normal-weight women whose waists were
smaller than 35 inches. The Shanghai Women's Health study found a
similar relationship between abdominal fatness and risk of death from
any cause in normal-weight women.
Measuring your waist is easy, if you know exactly where your waist
really is. Wrap a flexible measuring tape around your midsection where
the sides of your waist are the narrowest. This is usually even with
your navel. Make sure you keep the tape parallel to the floor.
An expert panel convened by the National Institutes of Health concluded
that a waist larger than 40 inches for men and 35 inches for women
increases the chances of developing heart disease, cancer, or other
chronic diseases. Although these are a bit generous, they are useful benchmarks.
Waist size is a simple, useful measurement because abdominal muscle can
be replaced by fat with age, even though weight may remain the same. So
increasing waist size can serve as a warning that you ought to take a
look at how much you are eating and exercising.
Keeping Things Level
Middle-aged spread is the source of millions of New Year's resolutions.
Gaining weight as you age increases the chances of developing one or
more chronic diseases.
In the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up
Study, middle-aged women and men who gained 11 to 22 pounds after age
20 were up to three times more likely to develop heart disease, high
blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, and gallstones than those who gained
five pounds or fewer. Those who gained more than 22 pounds had an even
larger risk of developing these diseases.
A more recent analysis of Nurses' Health Study data found that adult
weight gain—even after menopause—can increase the risk of
postmenopausal breast cancer.
Encouragingly, for women who had never used hormone replacement
therapy, losing weight after menopause—and keeping it off—cut their
risk of post-menopausal breast cancer in half.
What Causes Weight Gain?
Whether or not your weight changes depends on a simple rule:
Weight change = calories in - calories out
If you burn as many calories as you take in each day, there's
nothing left over for storage in fat cells and weight remains the same.
Eat more than you burn, though, and you end up adding fat and pounds.
Many things influence what and when you eat and how many calories
you burn. These turn what seems to be a straightforward pathway to
excess weight into a complex journey that may start very early in life.
Genes: Some people are genetically predisposed to
gain weight more easily than others or to store fat around the abdomen
and chest. It's also possible that humans have a genetic drive to eat
more than they need for the present in order to store energy for
future. This is called the thrifty gene hypothesis.
It suggests that eating extra food whenever possible helped early
humans survive feast-or-famine conditions. If such thrifty genes still
exist, they aren't doing us much good in an environment in which food
is constantly available.
Diet: At the risk of stating the obvious, the
quantity of food in your diet has a strong impact on weight. The
composition of your diet, though, seems to play little role in weight—a
calorie is a calorie, regardless of its source.
Physical activity: The "calories burned" part of the
weight-change equation often gets short shrift. The more active you
are, the more calories you burn, which means that less energy will be
available for storage as fat. Exercising more also reduces the chances
of developing heart disease, some types of cancer, and other chronic
diseases. In other words, physical activity is a key element of weight control and health.
What Leads to Weight Loss?
Just as weight gain is fundamentally caused by eating more calories
than you burn, the only way to lose weight is to eat fewer calories
than what you burn. People can cut back on calories and lose weight on
almost any diet, as long as they stick to it. The real challenge is finding a way to keep weight off over the long run.
Low-fat weight loss strategies don't work for most people. Low-fat
diets are routinely promoted as a path to good health. But they haven't
fulfilled their promise. One reason is that many people have
interpreted the term "low-fat" to mean "It's OK to eat as much low-fat
food as you want." For most people, eating less fat has meant eating
more carbohydrates. To the body, calories from carbohydrates are just
as effective for increasing weight as calories from fat.
In the United States, obesity has become increasingly common even as
the percentage of fat in the American diet has declined from 45 percent
in the 1960s to about 33 percent in the late 1990s.
In South Africa, nearly 60 percent of people are overweight even though
the average diet contains about 22 percent of calories from fat. Finally, experimental studies lasting one year or longer have not shown a link between dietary fat and weight.
And in the eight-year Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification
Trial, women assigned to a low-fat diet didn't lose, or gain more
weight than women eating their usual fare.
Low-carbohydrate, high-protein strategies look promising in the short term. Another
increasingly common approach to weight loss is eating more protein and
less carbohydrate. Some of these diets treat carbohydrates as if they
are evil, the root of all body fat and excess weight. That was
certainly true for the original Atkins diet, which popularized the
no-carb approach to dieting. And there is some evidence that a
low-carbohydrate diet may help people lose weight more quickly than a
low-fat diet, although so far, that evidence is short term.
Why do high-protein, low-carb diets seem to work more quickly than
low-fat, high-carbohydrate diets, at least in the short term? First,
chicken, beef, fish, beans, or other high-protein foods slow the
movement of food from the stomach to the intestine. Slower stomach
emptying means you feel full for longer and get hungrier later. Second,
protein's gentle, steady effect on blood sugar avoids the quick, steep
rise in blood sugar and just as quick hunger-bell-ringing fall that
occurs after eating a rapidly digested carbohydrate, like white bread
or baked potato. Third, the body uses more energy to digest protein
than it does to digest fat or carbohydrate.
No one knows the long-term effects of eating little or no
carbohydrates. Equally worrisome is the inclusion of unhealthy fats in
some of these diets.
If you want to go the lower-carb route, try to include some fruits,
vegetables, and whole-grain carbohydrates every day. They contain a
host of vitamins, minerals, and other phytonutrients that are essential
for good health and that you can't get out of a supplement bottle.
Choosing vegetable sources of fat and protein may also lower your risk
of heart disease and type 2 diabetes.
Mediterranean-style diets may be effective. Eating
a so-called Mediterranean-style diet—one that includes plenty of fruits
and vegetables and that is low in saturated fat but has a moderate
amount of unsaturated fat—offers another seemingly effective
alternative. In a controlled trial conducted by researchers at
Harvard-affiliated Brigham and Women's Hospital, 101 overweight men and
women were randomly assigned to a low-fat diet or a Mediterranean-style
diet. After 18 months, volunteers on the low-fat diet had gained an
average of 6 pounds while those on the Mediterranean diet lost 9
pounds.
By the study's end only 20 percent of those in the low-fat group were
still following the study diet, compared to more than half of those on
the Mediterranean-style diet.
Lessons from Losers
Since 1993, more than 5,000 women and men have joined the National
Weight Control Registry. This select "club" includes only people who
lost more than 30 pounds and kept them off for at least a year. What
was their secret?
- They exercised. Registry participants burn
an average of 400 calories per day in physical activity. That's the
equivalent of about 60 to 75 minutes of brisk walking, or 35 to 40
minutes of jogging.
- They ate fewer calories. On
average, registry volunteers consume about 1,400 calories a day. That's
significantly less than the calories consumed by the average American.
This doesn't mean, however, that you should aim for 1,400 calories a
day. What's right for you is based on your weight, height, and activity
level.
- They watched less television, limited fast food intake, cut back on sugars and sweets, and ate more fruits and vegetables.
In the early years of the registry, about a third of the volunteers
reported eating a low-fat diets. Lately, though, fewer volunteers
report eating low-fat diets, and more report eating moderate-fat diets.
Relatively few volunteers report eating low-carbohydrate diets, but
those who do seem to have had as much success in maintaining their
weight loss, compared with other members of the Weight Control
Registry.
These findings are echoed in a survey of more than 32,000 dieters reported in the June 2002 issue of Consumer Reports. Consumer Reports survey tended to adopt low-carbohydrate, higher-protein diets rather than low-fat diets.
Nearly one-quarter had lost at least 10 percent of their starting body
weight and kept it off for at least a year. Most chalked up their
success to eating less and exercising more. The vast majority did it on
their own, without utilizing commercial weight-loss programs or
resorting to weight-loss drugs. Interestingly, the successful losers in
the
Keep in mind that these are commonly used strategies, not hard and fast
rules. In fact, one of the main take-home messages is that successful
weight loss is very much a "do it your way" endeavor. What the Weight
Control Registry volunteers and the Consumer Reports
survey respondents have in common is a focus on exercise and daily
calories. In other words, they've learned to balance energy in and
energy out in a way that leads to weight loss or weight maintenance.
So despite all the pessimistic prognostications about the
impossibility of sticking with a weight-loss plan, these two surveys
show that it's possible to lose weight and keep it off. Unfortunately,
only a minority of people who try to lose weight follow the simple,
tried-and-true strategy of eating fewer calories and exercising daily. For weight control, an hour or more of exercise a day may be needed.
General Strategies for Achieving or Maintaining a Healthy Weight
It's easy to gain weight in what Yale psychologist Kelly Brownell calls
our "toxic food environment." How, then, can you lose weight if you
need to? Here are some suggestions that work:
-
Set a realistic goal. Many people pick
weight goals they'll have a hard time achieving, like fitting into a
size 8 dress or a wedding tuxedo from 20 years ago. A better initial
goal is 5 to 10 percent of your current weight. This may not put you in
league with the "beautiful people" profiled in popular magazines, but
it can lead to important improvements in weight-related conditions such
as high blood pressure and diabetes.
You don't have to stop there, of course. You can keep aiming for
another 5 to 10 percent until you're happy with your weight. By
breaking weight loss into more manageable chunks, you'll be more likely
to reach your goal.
- Slow and steady wins the race. Dieting
implies deprivation and hunger. You don't need either to lose weight if
you're willing to take the time to do it right. If you cut out just 100
calories a day, the equivalent of a single can of soda or a bedtime
snack, you would weigh 10 pounds less after a year. If, at the same
time, you added a brisk 30-minute walk five days a week, you could be
at least 20 pounds lighter.
- Move more.While the precise amount of physical activity needed to maintain a healthy weight may vary based on your diet and
your genes, the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart
Association conclude that "more activity increases the probability of success."
- Keep track.
It's easy to eat more than you plan to. A daily food diary can make you
more aware of exactly how much you are eating. Include everything, no
matter how small or insignificant it seems. Small noshes and drinks of
juice add up to real calories.
- Tame your blood sugar. Eating
foods that make your blood sugar and insulin levels shoot up and then
crash may contribute to weight gain. Such foods include white bread,
white rice, and other highly processed grain products. As an
alternative, choose foods that have a gentler effect on blood sugar
(what's called a lower glycemic index). These include whole grains such
as wheat berries, steel-cut oats, and whole-grain breads and pasta, as
well as beans, nuts, fruits, and vegetables.
- Don't be afraid of good fats.
Fat in a meal or in snacks such as nuts or corn chips helps you feel
full. Good fats such as olive or canola oil can also help improve your
cholesterol levels when you eat them in place of saturated or trans
fats or highly processed carbohydrates.
- Reach for slow foods.
Fast food is cheap, filling, and satisfying. It also delivers way more
calories, not to mention harmful saturated and trans fat, than you
need. People who eat at fast-food restaurants more than twice a week
are more likely to gain weight and show early signs of diabetes than
those who only occasionally eat fast food.
- Bring on the water and skip the soda. When
you are thirsty, reach for water. Drinking juice or sugared soda can
give you several hundred calories a day without even realizing it.
Several studies show that children and adults who drink soda or other
sugar-sweetened beverages are more likely to gain weight than those who
don't, and that switching from these to water or unsweetened beverages can reduce weight.
The Bottom Line: Recommendations for Healthy WeightWhat's sometimes lost in the dire predictions
about overweight and obesity in America are the enormous benefits of
staying lean or working toward a healthier weight. Maintaining a
healthy weight throughout life is associated with lower rates of
premature death and heart disease, some cancers, and other chronic
conditions. What if you're past that point? Losing 5 to 10 percent of
your weight can substantially improve your immediate health and will
decrease your risk of developing such problems. The best time to start
losing weight is with the first signs that your weight is straying
upward. The more overweight you are, the more difficult it can be to
lose weight. But as participants of the National Weight Control
Registry have proven, anyone can lose weight.
References
1. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
2. Zhang C, Rexrode KM, van Dam RM, Li TY, Hu FB. Abdominal Obesity and
the Risk of All–Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality. Sixteen
Years of Follow-Up in US Women. Circulation. 2008.
3. Zhang X, Shu XO, Yang G, et al. Abdominal adiposity and mortality in Chinese women. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167:886–92.
4. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment
of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Obesity Education Initiative.
5. Willett WC, Dietz WH, Colditz GA. Guidelines for healthy weight. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341:427–34.
6. Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, et al. Body size and fat
distribution as predictors of coronary heart disease among middle-aged
and older US men. Am J Epidemiol. 1995; 141:1117–27.
7. Willett WC, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, et al. Weight, weight change,
and coronary heart disease in women. Risk within the 'normal' weight
range. JAMA. 1995; 273:461–5.
8. Colditz GA, Willett WC, Rotnitzky A, Manson JE. Weight gain as a
risk factor for clinical diabetes mellitus in women. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 122:481–6.
9. Huang Z, Willett WC, Manson JE, et al. Body weight, weight change, and risk for hypertension in women. Ann Intern Med. 1998; 128:81–8.
10. Maclure KM, Hayes KC, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Speizer FE, Willett
WC. Weight, diet, and the risk of symptomatic gallstones in middle–aged
women. N Engl J Med. 1989; 321:563–9.
11. Eliassen AH, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Willett WC, Hankinson SE. Adult
weight change and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. JAMA. 2006; 296:193–201.
12. Neel JV, Weder AB, Julius S. Type II diabetes, essential
hypertension, and obesity as "syndromes of impaired genetic
homeostasis": the "thrifty genotype" hypothesis enters the 21st
century. Perspect Biol Med. 1998; 42:44–74.
13. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public
health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of
Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39:1423–34.
14. Patel SR, Hu FB. Short sleep duration and weight gain: a systematic
review. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008; 16:643–53.
15. Dansinger ML, Gleason JA, Griffith JL, Selker HP, Schaefer EJ.
Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for
weight loss and heart disease risk reduction: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2005; 293:43–53.
16. Is total fat consumption really decreasing? USDA Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion: 1998.
17. Diet and Health: Food Consumption and Nutrient Intake, Table 7:
Percentage of food energy from fat for individuals ages 2 and older,
1977–1996. Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.
18. Willett WC. Dietary fat plays a major role in obesity: no. Obes Rev. 2002; 3:59–68.
19. Willett WC, Leibel RL. Dietary fat is not a major determinant of body fat. Am J Med. 2002; 113 Suppl 9B:47S–59S.
20. Howard BV, Manson JE, Stefanick ML, et al. Low–fat dietary pattern
and weight change over 7 years: the Women's Health Initiative Dietary
Modification Trial. JAMA. 2006; 295:39–49.
21. Foster GD, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, et al. A randomized trial of a low–carbohydrate diet for obesity. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348:2082–90.
22. Samaha FF, Iqbal N, Seshadri P, et al. A low–carbohydrate as compared with a low–fat diet in severe obesity. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348:2074–81.
23. Gardner CD, Kiazand A, Alhassan S, et al. Comparison of the Atkins,
Zone, Ornish, and LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk
factors among overweight premenopausal women: the A TO Z Weight Loss
Study: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007; 297:969–77.
24. Halton TL, Hu FB. The effects of high-protein diets on
thermogenesis, satiety and weight loss: a critical review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004; 23:373–85.
25. Halton TL, Willett WC, Liu S, et al. Low–carbohydrate–diet score
and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355:1991–2002.
26. Halton TL, Liu S, Manson JE, Hu FB. Low–carbohydrate–diet score and risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008; 87:339–46.
27. McManus K, Antinoro L, Sacks F. A randomized controlled trial of a
moderate–fat, low–energy diet compared with a low-fat, low–energy diet
for weight loss in overweight adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001; 25:1503–11.
28. Wing RR, Hill JO. Successful weight loss maintenance. Annu Rev Nutr. 2001; 21:323–41.
29. Catenacci VA, Ogden LG, Stuht J, et al. Physical activity patterns in the National Weight Control Registry. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008; 16:153–61.
30. Phelan S, Wyatt HR, Hill JO, Wing RR. Are the Eating and Exercise Habits of Successful Weight Losers Changing? Obesity. 2006; 14:710–716.
31. Raynor DA, Phelan S, Hill JO, Wing RR. Television Viewing and
Long–Term Weight Maintenance: Results from the National Weight Control
Registry. Obesity. 2006; 14:1816–1824.
32. Phelan S, Wyatt H, Nassery S, et al. Three–Year Weight Change in
Successful Weight Losers Who Lost Weight on a Low–Carbohydrate Diet. Obesity. 2007; 15:2470–2477.
33. The truth about dieting. Consumer Reports 2002; 67:26–31.
34. Serdula MK, Mokdad AH, Williamson DF, Galuska DA, Mendlein JM,
Heath GW. Prevalence of attempting weight loss and strategies for
controlling weight. JAMA. 1999; 282:1353–58.
35. 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
36. Pereira MA, Kartashov AI, Ebbeling CB, et al. Fast–food habits,
weight gain, and insulin resistance (the CARDIA study): 15-year
prospective analysis. Lancet. 2005; 365:36–42.
37. Ludwig DS, Peterson KE, Gortmaker SL. Relation between consumption
of sugar–sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective,
observational analysis. Lancet. 2001; 357:505–508.
38. Schulze MB, Manson JE, Ludwig DS, et al. Sugar–sweetened beverages,
weight gain, and incidence of type 2 diabetes in young and middle–aged
women. JAMA. 2004; 292:927–34.
39. Ebbeling CB, Feldman HA, Osganian SK, Chomitz VR, Ellenbogen SJ,
Ludwig DS. Effects of decreasing sugar–sweetened beverage consumption
on body weight in adolescents: a randomized, controlled pilot study. Pediatrics. 2006; 117:673–80.
|
Terms of Use
The
aim of the Harvard School of Public Health Nutrition Source is to
provide timely information on diet and nutrition for clinicians, allied
health professionals, and the public. The contents of this Web site are
not intended to offer personal medical advice. You should seek the
advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any
questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard
professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something
you have read on this Web site. The information does not mention brand
names, nor does it endorse any particular products.
|